Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-21 | Worcester Academy | NE-Prep-Girls | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.000 | 0.3248 | 0.3248 |
| 2021-22 | Worcester Academy | NE-Prep-Girls | 21 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 0.950 | 0.3086 | 0.3086 |
| 2022-23 | — | 16U-AAA-W | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.500 | 0.1786 | 0.1786 |
| 2023-24 | Groton | NE-Prep-Girls | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2024-25 | Groton | NE-Prep-Girls | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Hamilton | NESCAC | FR | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natalie Snodgrass | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG | 1.000 | UConn |
| Kaylee Druk | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG | 0.000 | Syracuse |
| Tianna Gunderson | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.20 PPG | 0.069 | Minnesota |
| Presley Norby | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.20 PPG | 0.525 | Wisconsin |
| Gabbie Hughes | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG | 1.121 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gracyn Knowles | 2024-25 · 0.92 PPG | 0.548 | Wisconsin-River Falls | WIAC |
| Anna Carman | 2010-11 · 1.24 PPG | — | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Sage Gerard | 2015-16 · 1.24 PPG | — | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Sarah Montrose | 2015-16 · 1.24 PPG | — | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Mackenzie Rugland | 2017-18 · 1.24 PPG | — | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.