IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marlie Berglin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 San Diego Angels 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 48 6 24 30 0.625 0.2128 0.2128 — —
2024-25 San Diego Angels 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 46 13 17 30 0.652 0.2221 0.2221 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 18 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3389
Forward overall
#120
in 19U-AAA-W

D1 Comparables

Jacqueline Kaasa
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.46 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.52 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Wente
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacqueline Kaasa
Bemidji State ·
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sydney Brodt
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.