← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lexi Bonfe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 1 2 3 0.120 0.0181 0.0181
2018-19 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 4 2 6 0.240 0.0362 0.0362
2019-20 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 6 13 19 0.760 0.1148 0.1148
2020-21 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 19 14 9 23 1.210 0.1828 0.1828
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA 29 11 13 24 0.828
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA 29 11 10 21 0.724
2022-23 St. Norbert D3 NCHA 29 8 9 17 0.586
2021-22 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA 8 0 1 1 0.125
2021-22 St. Michael's College D3 FR 5 0 1 1 0.200
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA 14 2 3 5 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2021-22 · St. Michael's College
+404.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6165
Forward overall
#1405
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Penn State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Yale
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Princeton (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Penn State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Sacred Heart ·
0.323 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.