IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sydney Vautour Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Shamrocks U16 JWHL-U16 24 2 2 4 0.167 0.0363 0.0363 — —
2019-20 Boston Shamrocks JWHL-U19 18 4 0 4 0.222 0.0834 0.0834 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 26 9 9 18 0.692
2023-24 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 26 7 12 19 0.731
2022-23 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 23 2 4 6 0.261
2021-22 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 22 2 14 16 0.727
2020-21 Castleton D3 NEHC — 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 1 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11414
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

Katie McMillan
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Penn State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lucy Burton
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Yale
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
Lexi Edwards
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sharon Frankel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Princeton (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Huntington
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Katie McMillan
Penn State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucy Burton
Yale ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lexi Edwards
Sacred Heart ·
0.323 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.