IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ciara Wall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Worcester Academy NE-Prep-Girls 27 12 40 52 1.930 1.1976 1.1976 — —
2018-19 Worcester Academy USHS-W 27 18 34 52 1.926 0.5791 0.5791 — —
2019-20 Worcester Academy USHS-W 30 18 30 48 1.600 0.4811 0.4811 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC — 28 6 11 17 0.607
2024-25 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 28 6 11 17 0.607
2024-25 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — — 28 6 11 17 0.607
2023-24 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 26 9 16 25 0.962
2023-24 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 28 10 16 26 0.929
2023-24 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — — 28 10 16 26 0.929
2022-23 Plattsburgh D3 — JR 29 4 22 26 0.897
2022-23 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 29 4 22 26 0.897
2022-23 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — — 29 4 22 26 0.897
2021-22 New Hampshire D1 — — 15 0 2 2 0.133
2020-21 New Hampshire D1 — — 21 0 6 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.82
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2020-21 · New Hampshire
-65.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#436
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.54 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Annie Roche
Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.