IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Allison Urlaub Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Burnsville High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 1 3 4 0.160 0.0242 0.0242 — —
2017-18 Burnsville High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 1 2 3 0.120 0.0181 0.0181 — —
2018-19 Burnsville High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 9 13 22 0.880 0.1329 0.1329 — —
2019-20 Burnsville High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 7 4 11 0.440 0.0664 0.0664 — —
2020-21 Burnsville High (women) USHS-MN-W 20 9 7 16 0.800 0.1208 0.1208 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 23 8 7 15 0.652
2023-24 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 27 7 16 23 0.852
2022-23 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 25 5 7 12 0.480
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 25 4 3 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2021-22 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+275.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7350
Forward overall
#323
Forward born in 2003
#1878
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Bäckebo
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Syracuse (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Emily Antony
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
North Dakota ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Amanda Bäckebo
Syracuse ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.