IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jerica Friese Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Fargo North/South High USHS-W 24 12 14 26 1.083 0.3257 0.3257 — —
2019-20 Fargo North/South High USHS-W 26 25 17 42 1.615 0.4858 0.4858 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Concordia D3 — — 25 9 5 14 0.560
2023-24 Concordia D3 — SR 25 7 2 9 0.360
2022-23 Concordia D3 — JR 24 12 6 18 0.750
2021-22 Concordia D3 — SO 23 14 8 22 0.957
2020-21 Concordia D3 — FR 5 2 1 3 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2020-21 · Concordia
+115.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1136
Forward overall
#381
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.16 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Haley Mack
Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Bergland
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Corbin Boyd
Minnesota State ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.