IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Morganne Dee Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Lancaster/Iroquois/Depew USHS-W 20 2 5 7 0.350 0.1052 0.1052 — —
2017-18 Lancaster/Iroquois/Depew USHS-W 21 10 7 17 0.809 0.2434 0.2434 — —
2019-20 Lancaster/Iroquois/Depew USHS-W 18 21 13 34 1.889 0.5680 0.5680 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Arcadia D3 UCHC — 24 6 5 11 0.458
2023-24 Arcadia D3 UCHC JR 21 7 2 9 0.429
2022-23 Arcadia D3 UCHC SO 24 12 11 23 0.958
2021-22 Arcadia D3 UCHC FR 24 11 8 19 0.792
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2021-22 · Arcadia
+391.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1540
Forward overall
#522
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Jacqueline Kaasa
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.46 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sara Hjalmarsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Providence (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.52 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

McKenzie Rich
Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cassie Hunter
Connecticut College · 2011-12
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cara Jankowski
Wesleyan · 2007-08
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.