Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Lancaster/Iroquois/Depew | USHS-W | 20 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.350 | 0.0297 | 0.0297 |
| 2017-18 | Lancaster/Iroquois/Depew | USHS-W | 21 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 0.809 | 0.0687 | 0.0687 |
| 2019-20 | Lancaster/Iroquois/Depew | USHS-W | 18 | 21 | 13 | 34 | 1.889 | 0.1604 | 0.1604 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Arcadia | UCHC | SR | 24 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.458 |
| 2023-24 | Arcadia | UCHC | JR | 21 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 0.429 |
| 2022-23 | Arcadia | UCHC | SO | 24 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 0.958 |
| 2021-22 | Arcadia | UCHC | FR | 24 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 0.792 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rose Rather | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.824 | Holy Cross |
| Mallorie Iozzo | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG | 0.069 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Sierra Smith | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Taylor Heise | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.897 | Minnesota |
| Sierra Semmel | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG | 0.000 | Maine |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kayson Ruegge | 2022-23 · 0.38 PPG | 0.500 | SUNY Plattsburgh | SUNYAC |
| Ella Thoreson | 2024-25 · 0.39 PPG | 0.500 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Autumn Burt | 2023-24 · 0.50 PPG | — | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Macy Peterson | 2022-23 · 0.93 PPG | 0.194 | Post | CHA-W |
| Michelle Smith | 2023-24 · 1.44 PPG | 0.130 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.