← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sadie Long Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Holy Family/Waconia High USHS-MN-W 25 5 2 7 0.280 0.0423 0.0423
2017-18 Holy Family/Waconia High USHS-MN-W 25 9 13 22 0.880 0.1329 0.1329
2018-19 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 25 9 19 28 1.120 0.1691 0.1691
2019-20 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 25 10 4 14 0.560 0.0846 0.0846
2020-21 Farmington High MN (women) USHS-MN-W 21 20 14 34 1.619 0.2445 0.2445
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 14 6 3 9 0.643
2023-24 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 JR 24 10 18 28 1.167
2022-23 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 SO 20 8 4 12 0.600
2021-22 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 FR 20 2 4 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2021-22 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+126.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4303
Forward overall
#172
Forward born in 2003
#729
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.