← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abbie DeLong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 St. Croix Valley Fusion USHS-W 24 2 6 8 0.333 0.1002 0.1002
2017-18 St. Croix Valley Fusion USHS-W 23 4 10 14 0.609 0.1830 0.1830
2018-19 St. Croix Valley Fusion USHS-W 23 17 13 30 1.304 0.3922 0.3922
2019-20 St. Croix Valley Fusion USHS-W 24 22 7 29 1.208 0.3633 0.3633
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Bethel D3 MIAC 25 5 2 7 0.280
2023-24 Bethel D3 MIAC 27 5 6 11 0.407
2022-23 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 2 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 10 2 1 3 0.300
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 8 0 1 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2020-21 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
-52.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1829
Forward overall
#625
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.38 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vermont ·
0.265 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
RPI ·
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.