← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brooke Lemke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 River Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 8 11 19 0.760 0.1148 0.1148
2018-19 River Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 13 10 23 0.920 0.1389 0.1389
2019-20 River Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 15 14 29 1.160 0.1752 0.1752
2020-21 River Lakes High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 6 9 15 0.714 0.1079 0.1079
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC 29 3 2 5 0.172
2023-24 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC JR 26 3 8 11 0.423
2022-23 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SO 23 5 4 9 0.391
2021-22 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC FR 11 3 3 6 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2021-22 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+393.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5802
Forward overall
#1244
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.