IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bre Simon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Elk River/Zimmerman (women) USHS-MN-W 25 11 13 24 0.960 0.1450 0.1450 — —
2013-14 Elk River/Zimmerman (women) USHS-MN-W 24 5 16 21 0.875 0.1321 0.1321 — —
2014-15 Elk River/Zimmerman (women) USHS-MN-W 24 12 16 28 1.167 0.1762 0.1762 — —
2015-16 Elk River/Zimmerman (women) USHS-MN-W 25 21 16 37 1.480 0.2235 0.2235 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 26 17 22 39 1.500
2018-19 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 30 27 37 64 2.133
2017-18 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 30 31 25 56 1.867
2016-17 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 26 17 9 26 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2016-17 · Hamline
+471.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3954
Forward overall
#149
Forward born in 1997
#616
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Jacqueline Kaasa
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.46 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.52 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Wente
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacqueline Kaasa
Bemidji State ·
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sydney Brodt
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.