← New Search ↗ Social Card

Courtney Moriarty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Northfield Mt. Hermon NE-Prep-Girls 14 13 13 26 1.860 1.1541 1.1541
2012-13 Northfield Mt. Hermon NE-Prep-Girls 28 17 14 31 1.110 0.6888 0.6888
2013-14 Connecticut Polar Bears 19U 19U-AAA-W 35 11 15 26 0.743 0.2530 0.2530
2014-15 Northfield Mt. Hermon NE-Prep-Girls 24 2 3 5 0.210 0.1303 0.1303
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Plattsburgh D3 SR 31 20 22 42 1.355
2018-19 Plattsburgh State D3 31 20 22 42 1.355
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SR 31 20 22 42 1.355
2017-18 Plattsburgh D3 JR 30 30 16 46 1.533
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 JR 30 30 16 46 1.533
2016-17 Plattsburgh D3 SO 30 11 15 26 0.867
2016-17 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SO 30 11 15 26 0.867
2015-16 Plattsburgh D3 FR 27 20 14 34 1.259
2015-16 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 FR 27 20 14 34 1.259
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.26
2015-16 · Plattsburgh
+720.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4024
Forward overall
#140
Forward born in 1996
#263
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Syracuse (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Syracuse ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindenwood ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Merrimack ·
0.206 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.