IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Courtney Wittig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Bay Area Ice Bears USHS-W 21 16 9 25 1.190 0.3580 0.3580 — —
2012-13 Bay Area Ice Bears USHS-W 23 26 16 42 1.826 0.5491 0.5491 — —
2013-14 Bay Area Ice Bears USHS-W 22 27 26 53 2.409 0.7244 0.7244 — —
2014-15 Bay Area Ice Bears USHS-W 23 40 20 60 2.609 0.7844 0.7844 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — JR 29 27 14 41 1.414
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — SO 30 14 19 33 1.100
2016-17 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — FR 26 16 2 18 0.692
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.76
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2016-17 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
-8.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#243
Forward overall
#60
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.78 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.75 No data
NCAAe PPG
Phoebe Staenz
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Yale (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.86 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aly Tremblay
RPI ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
Mercyhurst ·
0.156 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Abbenante
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.