IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Molly Garin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Holy Family/Waconia High USHS-MN-W 21 5 3 8 0.381 0.0575 0.0575 — —
2014-15 Holy Family/Waconia High USHS-MN-W 23 6 6 12 0.522 0.0788 0.0788 — —
2015-16 Holy Family/Waconia High USHS-MN-W 25 15 16 31 1.240 0.1872 0.1872 — —
2016-17 Holy Family/Waconia High USHS-MN-W 25 28 26 54 2.160 0.3262 0.3262 — —
2017-18 Holy Family/Waconia High USHS-MN-W 25 37 18 55 2.200 0.3322 0.3322 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC — 23 13 8 21 0.913
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC — 6 2 5 7 1.167
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC — 26 15 24 39 1.500
2018-19 Hamline D3 MIAC — 30 19 19 38 1.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.27
2018-19 · Hamline
+348.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1885
Forward overall
#136
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Karlie Lund
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG
→ Princeton (1.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carly Bullock
Princeton ·
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Karlie Lund
Princeton ·
1.182 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Catherine Skaja
Minnesota ·
0.342 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.