IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Callie Hoff Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Duluth High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 13 10 23 0.920 0.1389 0.1389 — —
2014-15 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 21 28 49 1.960 0.2960 0.2960 — —
2015-16 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 19 26 45 1.800 0.2718 0.2718 — —
2016-17 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 14 21 8 29 2.071 0.3128 0.3128 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — — 26 26 41 67 2.577
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — — 12 12 11 23 1.917
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — JR 28 15 21 36 1.286
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — SO 28 24 10 34 1.214
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC FR 28 20 17 37 1.321
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.32
2017-18 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+420.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1906
Forward overall
#138
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sylvia Marolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.32 No data
NCAAe PPG
Demi Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Catherine Skaja
Minnesota ·
0.342 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Bergland
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.