IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eliza Beaudin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Hebron NE-Prep-Girls 23 2 2 4 0.170 0.1055 0.1055 — —
2017-18 Hebron NE-Prep-Girls 23 1 2 3 0.130 0.0807 0.0807 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Elmira D3 — SR 30 18 24 42 1.400
2020-21 Elmira D3 — JR 14 9 11 20 1.429
2019-20 Elmira D3 — SO 18 14 9 23 1.278
2018-19 Elmira D3 — FR 28 17 17 34 1.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.21
2018-19 · Elmira
+1464.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10567
Forward overall
#356
Forward born in 2000
#723
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Mallorie Iozzo
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Madison Oelkers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joie Phelps
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mac Johnson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mallorie Iozzo
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Madison Oelkers
Minnesota ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joie Phelps
Cornell ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.