IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexia Klaas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Duluth High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 8 7 15 0.652 0.0985 0.0985 — —
2011-12 Duluth High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 18 21 0.840 0.1268 0.1268 — —
2012-13 Duluth High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 15 11 26 1.130 0.1707 0.1707 — —
2013-14 Duluth High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 20 9 29 1.160 0.1752 0.1752 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA SR 28 17 17 34 1.214
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA JR 27 12 13 25 0.926
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA SO 21 15 7 22 1.048
2015-16 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W SO 37 0 1 1 0.027
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2015-16 · Minnesota Duluth
-81.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4751
Forward overall
#157
Forward born in 1996
#874
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Grubbs
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2013-14
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mollie Koch
Saint Mary's · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Delaney Calabrese
Saint Mary's · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.