IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katy Meehan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Thayer NE-Prep-Girls 23 18 15 33 1.430 0.8873 0.8873 — —
2016-17 Thayer NE-Prep-Girls 29 23 21 44 1.520 0.9432 0.9432 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Saint Anselm D1 NEWHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Saint Anselm D1 NEWHA — 33 15 12 27 0.818
2018-19 Saint Anselm D3 NEWHA — 28 14 19 33 1.179
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.92
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.18
2018-19 · Saint Anselm
+28.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#266
Forward overall
#27
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Erin Conway
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.48 PPG
→ Brown (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Average
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.88 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phoebe Staenz
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Yale (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.86 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bridget Carey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Brown (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.86 Average
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erin Conway
Brown ·
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Phoebe Staenz
Yale ·
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.