Abbey Luth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2016-17	Portsmouth Abbey	NE-Prep-Girls	19	32	30	62	3.260	2.0228	2.0228	—	—
2017-18	Portsmouth Abbey	NE-Prep-Girls	21	50	33	83	3.950	2.4510	2.4510	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2022-23	Nazareth	D3	—	—	27	8	24	32	1.185
2021-22	Nazareth	D3	—	—	29	19	14	33	1.138
2020-21	Nazareth	D3	—	—	9	5	1	6	0.667
2019-20	Nazareth	D3	—	—	26	15	20	35	1.346
2018-19	William Smith	D3	—	—	28	18	13	31	1.107

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

2.44

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

1.11

2018-19 · William Smith

-54.6% vs. projection

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.