IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sophie McGovern Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 2 2 4 0.167 0.0252 0.0252 — —
2012-13 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 20 16 36 1.565 0.2363 0.2363 — —
2013-14 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 29 21 50 2.083 0.3146 0.3146 — —
2014-15 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 29 23 52 2.080 0.3141 0.3141 — —
2015-16 Proctor/Hermantown High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 24 16 40 1.600 0.2416 0.2416 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Norwich D3 — SR 29 19 25 44 1.517
2018-19 Norwich D3 — JR 29 13 17 30 1.034
2017-18 Norwich D3 — SO 30 16 29 45 1.500
2016-17 Norwich D3 — FR 28 11 13 24 0.857
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2016-17 · Norwich
+270.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2098
Forward overall
#170
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Brooke Madsen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG
→ Penn State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kiki Radke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooke Madsen
Penn State ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Danielle Marmer
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.