IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erin Meyers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Henry Sibley High USHS-MN-W 24 10 5 15 0.625 0.0944 0.0944 — —
2015-16 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 10 12 22 0.880 0.1329 0.1329 — —
2016-17 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 9 7 16 0.640 0.0966 0.0966 — —
2017-18 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 12 10 22 0.880 0.1329 0.1329 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Saint Anselm D1 NEWHA SR 29 10 20 30 1.034
2020-21 Saint Anselm D1 NEWHA JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Saint Anselm D1 NEWHA SO 33 7 9 16 0.485
2018-19 Saint Anselm D3 NEWHA FR 29 7 19 26 0.897
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.90
2018-19 · Saint Anselm
+785.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6491
Forward overall
#1520
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Bäckebo
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Syracuse (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Emily Antony
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
North Dakota ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Amanda Bäckebo
Syracuse ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.