← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Whitney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-12-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Little Caesars 19U AAA JWHL-U19 26 12 25 37 1.423 0.5342 0.5342
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Plattsburgh D3 SR 29 6 11 17 0.586
2021-22 Plattsburgh State D3 29 6 11 17 0.586
2021-22 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 29 6 11 17 0.586
2020-21 Plattsburgh State D3 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Plattsburgh D3 SO 27 14 12 26 0.963
2019-20 Plattsburgh State D3 27 14 12 26 0.963
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 27 14 12 26 0.963
2018-19 Plattsburgh D3 FR 29 11 14 25 0.862
2018-19 Plattsburgh State D3 29 11 14 25 0.862
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 29 11 14 25 0.862
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.50
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2018-19 · Plattsburgh
+73.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 29 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#747
Forward overall
#48
Forward born in 1999
#12
in JWHL-U19

D1 Comparables

USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.53 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.54 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Strong
NCAAe PPG
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
1.073 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.