| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-14 | — | USHS-W | 51 | 66 | 43 | 109 | 2.137 | 0.6427 | 0.6427 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | University School | USHS-W | 24 | 58 | 32 | 90 | 3.750 | 1.1276 | 1.1276 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | University School | USHS-W | 22 | 43 | 22 | 65 | 2.954 | 0.8884 | 0.8884 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Northfield Mt. Hermon | NE-Prep-Girls | 27 | 26 | 11 | 37 | 1.370 | 0.8501 | 0.8501 | — | — |
| 2017-18 | Northfield Mt. Hermon | NE-Prep-Girls | 19 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 1.210 | 0.7508 | 0.7508 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Plattsburgh | D3 | — | SR | 28 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 0.893 |
| 2022-23 | Plattsburgh State | D3 | — | — | 28 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 0.893 |
| 2022-23 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | — | — | 28 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 0.893 |
| 2021-22 | Plattsburgh | D3 | — | SR | 30 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 1.333 |
| 2021-22 | Plattsburgh State | D3 | — | — | 30 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 1.333 |
| 2021-22 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | — | — | 30 | 20 | 20 | 40 | 1.333 |
| 2020-21 | Plattsburgh State | D3 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2020-21 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | Plattsburgh | D3 | — | SO | 26 | 16 | 18 | 34 | 1.308 |
| 2019-20 | Plattsburgh State | D3 | — | — | 26 | 16 | 18 | 34 | 1.308 |
| 2019-20 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | — | — | 26 | 16 | 18 | 34 | 1.308 |
| 2018-19 | Plattsburgh | D3 | — | FR | 25 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 0.960 |
| 2018-19 | Plattsburgh State | D3 | — | — | 25 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 0.960 |
| 2018-19 | SUNY Plattsburgh | D3 | — | — | 25 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 0.960 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.