← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaleigh Martinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Champlin Park High (Women) USHS-W 25 9 12 21 0.840 0.2526 0.2526
2013-14 Champlin Park High (Women) USHS-W 24 12 6 18 0.750 0.2255 0.2255
2014-15 Champlin Park High (Women) USHS-W 25 16 16 32 1.280 0.3849 0.3849
2015-16 Champlin Park High (Women) USHS-W 25 21 9 30 1.200 0.3608 0.3608
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 SR 27 26 10 36 1.333
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 JR 27 14 9 23 0.852
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 SO 27 16 11 27 1.000
2016-17 Wisconsin-Superior D3 FR 27 9 7 16 0.593
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2016-17 · Wisconsin-Superior
+87.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1771
Forward overall
#60
Forward born in 1998
#602
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.37 No data
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota State ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.