Hannah Kiraly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

No junior season data found for this player.

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2019-20	Plattsburgh	D3	—	SR	27	1	22	23	0.852
2019-20	Plattsburgh State	D3	—	—	27	1	22	23	0.852
2019-20	SUNY Plattsburgh	D3	—	SR	27	1	22	23	0.852
2018-19	Plattsburgh	D3	—	JR	31	3	18	21	0.677
2018-19	Plattsburgh State	D3	—	—	31	3	18	21	0.677
2018-19	SUNY Plattsburgh	D3	—	JR	31	3	18	21	0.677
2017-18	Plattsburgh	D3	—	SO	30	3	18	21	0.700
2017-18	SUNY Plattsburgh	D3	—	SO	30	3	18	21	0.700
2016-17	Plattsburgh	D3	—	FR	30	2	15	17	0.567
2016-17	SUNY Plattsburgh	D3	—	FR	30	2	15	17	0.567

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.