IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lexi Klein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 0 5 5 0.200 0.0302 0.0302 — —
2013-14 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 5 2 7 0.280 0.0423 0.0423 — —
2014-15 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 3 6 9 0.360 0.0544 0.0544 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Endicott D3 NEHC — 28 10 9 19 0.679
2017-18 Endicott D3 — JR 25 10 11 21 0.840
2016-17 Endicott D3 — SO 27 7 12 19 0.704
2015-16 Endicott D3 — FR 21 9 10 19 0.905
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.90
2015-16 · Endicott
+2034.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12242
Forward overall
#4635
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Taylor Heise
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Laura Anderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Yale (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Presley Norby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sierra Smith
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mallory Rushton
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Heise
Minnesota ·
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Laura Anderson
Yale ·
0.290 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Presley Norby
Wisconsin ·
0.525 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.