IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryn Labbe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Warner Hockey School JWHL-U19 27 7 16 23 0.852 0.3198 0.3198 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Norwich D3 NEHC SR 29 8 9 17 0.586
2017-18 Norwich D3 NEHC JR 30 15 23 38 1.267
2016-17 Norwich D3 NEHC SO 29 8 16 24 0.828
2015-16 Norwich D3 NEHC FR 26 12 6 18 0.692
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2015-16 · Norwich
+152.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2280
Forward overall
#93
Forward born in 1997
#58
in JWHL-U19

D1 Comparables

Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brynn Puppe
Williams · 2016-17
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Madi Nolan
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mollie Johnson
Neumann · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.