IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sydney Simone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0189 0.0189 — —
2013-14 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 5 7 0.280 0.0423 0.0423 — —
2014-15 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 25 14 16 30 1.200 0.1812 0.1812 — —
2015-16 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 24 14 13 27 1.125 0.1699 0.1699 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 28 9 8 17 0.607
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 28 7 9 16 0.571
2017-18 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 27 10 26 36 1.333
2016-17 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 28 6 24 30 1.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.07
2016-17 · Lake Forest
+617.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5451
Forward overall
#1112
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sierra Semmel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Zumwinkle
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Chancellor
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.