IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emily Bauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Central Wisconsin Storm USHS-W 22 3 4 7 0.318 0.0957 0.0957 — —
2014-15 Central Wisconsin Storm USHS-W 23 4 14 18 0.783 0.2353 0.2353 — —
2015-16 Central Wisconsin Storm USHS-W 23 9 38 47 2.043 0.6145 0.6145 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SR 28 2 13 15 0.536
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC JR 29 4 10 14 0.483
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 20 2 0 2 0.100
2016-17 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 18 5 4 9 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2016-17 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+26.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1419
Forward overall
#483
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phoebe Staenz
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Yale (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.62 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bridget Carey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Brown (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.62 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kassie Lien
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2011-12
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivy Boric
Plattsburgh · 2017-18
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Courtney Moriarty
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.