IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jessica VonRuden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Owatonna High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 5 11 0.440 0.0664 0.0664 — —
2014-15 Owatonna High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 13 11 24 1.000 0.1510 0.1510 — —
2015-16 Owatonna High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 36 12 48 1.920 0.2899 0.2899 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA — 30 28 20 48 1.600
2021-22 Adrian D3 NCHA — 25 11 12 23 0.920
2020-21 Adrian D3 NCHA — 21 20 14 34 1.619
2019-20 Adrian D3 NCHA — 28 9 16 25 0.893
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA — 18 9 3 12 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2018-19 · Adrian
+232.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3777
Forward overall
#142
Forward born in 1998
#549
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Molly Strabley
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Molly Strabley
Princeton ·
0.103 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.