← New Search ↗ Social Card

Julia Pias Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 2 5 7 0.292 0.0440 0.0440
2015-16 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 6 12 0.480 0.0725 0.0725
2016-17 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 19 23 0.920 0.1389 0.1389
2017-18 Maple Grove High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 1 16 17 0.680 0.1027 0.1027
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Saint Benedict D3 SR 23 2 5 7 0.304
2020-21 Saint Benedict D3 JR 9 1 2 3 0.333
2019-20 Saint Benedict D3 SO 22 3 11 14 0.636
2018-19 Saint Benedict D3 FR 23 7 5 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2018-19 · Saint Benedict
+420.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7276
Forward overall
#1841
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vermont ·
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.