IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jessica Bird Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Moose Lake Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 21 14 35 1.400 0.2114 0.2114 — —
2013-14 Moose Lake Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 23 21 44 1.760 0.2658 0.2658 — —
2014-15 Moose Lake Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 34 41 75 3.000 0.4530 0.4530 — —
2015-16 Moose Lake Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 34 21 55 2.200 0.3322 0.3322 — —
2016-17 Moose Lake Area High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 48 24 72 2.880 0.4349 0.4349 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SO 18 3 9 12 0.667
2017-18 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC FR 28 4 10 14 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2017-18 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+48.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#976
Forward overall
#25
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ava Kison
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.688 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Avery Farrell
Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Crocker
Elmira · 2016-17
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.