icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Millbrook | NE-Prep-Girls | 20 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.150 | 0.0931 | 0.0931 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Millbrook | NE-Prep-Girls | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Millbrook | NE-Prep-Girls | 22 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.050 | 0.0310 | 0.0310 | — | — |
| 2017-18 | Millbrook | NE-Prep-Girls | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Manhattanville | D3 | — | — | 27 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.481 |
| 2021-22 | Manhattanville | D3 | — | — | 27 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 0.778 |
| 2020-21 | Manhattanville | D3 | — | — | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | Chatham | D3 | UCHC | — | 25 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0.360 |
| 2018-19 | Chatham | D3 | UCHC | — | 25 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 0.440 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.