icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Stillwater High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 18 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.056 | 0.0089 | 0.0089 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Stillwater High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.160 | 0.0257 | 0.0257 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Stillwater High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.360 | 0.0578 | 0.0578 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Stillwater High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 0.917 | 0.1472 | 0.1472 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Stillwater High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 0.640 | 0.1028 | 0.1028 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-W | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2020-21 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | — | 6 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.833 |
| 2019-20 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | JR | 26 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 0.846 |
| 2018-19 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | SO | 26 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0.423 |
| 2017-18 | Hamline | D3 | MIAC | FR | 17 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.235 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.