IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Riley Schneider Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Willmar High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 0 3 3 0.125 0.0189 0.0189 — —
2012-13 Willmar High (women) USHS-MN-W 23 8 6 14 0.609 0.0919 0.0919 — —
2013-14 Willmar High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 11 13 24 1.000 0.1510 0.1510 — —
2014-15 Willmar High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 17 21 38 1.520 0.2295 0.2295 — —
2015-16 Willmar High (women) USHS-MN-W 13 10 8 18 1.385 0.2091 0.2091 — —
2016-17 Willmar High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 19 16 35 1.458 0.2202 0.2202 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Saint Benedict D3 — — 8 1 1 2 0.250
2019-20 Saint Benedict D3 — — 24 3 5 8 0.333
2018-19 Saint Benedict D3 — — 23 5 5 10 0.435
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2018-19 · Saint Benedict
+135.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3204
Forward overall
#409
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Jacqueline Kaasa
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.46 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gabby Billing
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charly Dalhquist
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacqueline Kaasa
Bemidji State ·
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mariah Gardner
Minnesota State ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Abby Halluska
Bemidji State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.