IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tess Dupre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 28 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 30 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 24 0 2 2 0.080 0.0496 0.0496 — —
2015-16 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep-Girls 33 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Colby D3 NESCAC — 23 8 12 20 0.870
2018-19 Colby D3 NESCAC — 20 4 4 8 0.400
2017-18 Colby D3 NESCAC — 23 3 4 7 0.304
2016-17 Colby D3 NESCAC — 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#16744
Forward overall
#1573
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Presley Norby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG
Laura Anderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Yale (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Heise
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Mallory Rushton
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sierra Smith
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Presley Norby
Wisconsin ·
0.525 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Laura Anderson
Yale ·
0.290 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Heise
Minnesota ·
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.