IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Morgan Mordini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Worcester Academy USHS-W 25 1 1 2 0.080 0.0241 0.0241 — —
2015-16 Worcester Academy USHS-W 28 1 4 5 0.179 0.0537 0.0537 — —
2016-17 Worcester Academy USHS-W 25 5 14 19 0.760 0.2285 0.2285 — —
2017-18 Worcester Academy NE-Prep-Girls 27 14 34 48 1.780 1.1045 1.1045 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Elmira D3 — GR 26 13 18 31 1.192
2021-22 Elmira D3 — SR 30 12 31 43 1.433
2020-21 Elmira D3 — JR 12 7 11 18 1.500
2019-20 Elmira D3 — SO 28 11 19 30 1.071
2018-19 Elmira D3 — FR 27 2 8 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.75
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2018-19 · Elmira
-50.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#605
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
1.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Theresa Knutson
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 3.95 PPG
→ UConn (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
1.09 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooke Avery
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Theresa Knutson
UConn ·
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.