IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Amanda Sergent Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Northland Pines High USHS-W 23 26 21 47 2.043 0.6145 0.6145 — —
2014-15 Northland Pines High USHS-W 19 15 7 22 1.158 0.3482 0.3482 — —
2015-16 Northland Pines High USHS-W 23 25 17 42 1.826 0.5491 0.5491 — —
2016-17 Northland Pines High USHS-W 22 40 17 57 2.591 0.7791 0.7791 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC — 24 11 7 18 0.750
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC — 10 5 2 7 0.700
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 26 8 12 20 0.769
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 26 4 5 9 0.346
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 27 10 8 18 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.64
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Superior
+4.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#396
Forward overall
#108
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.74 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.73 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Erin Conway
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.48 PPG
→ Brown (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Celia Midtbo
Saint Mary's · 2022-23
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hailey Herdine
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
1.185 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessica Bird
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.