← New Search ↗ Social Card

Madison Nichols Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-07-05 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Buffalo Beauts · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Boston Shamrocks U16 JWHL-U16 12 9 3 12 1.000 0.2178 0.2178
2017-18 Boston Shamrocks JWHL-U19 25 9 12 21 0.840 0.3153 0.3153
2022-23 Buffalo Beauts PHF 22 1 2 3 0.136
2023-24 Buffalo Beauts PHF 22 1 2 3 0.136
2024-25 Buffalo Beauts PHF 22 1 2 3 0.136
2025-26 Buffalo Beauts PHF 22 1 2 3 0.136
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Nazareth D3 26 17 23 40 1.538
2020-21 Nazareth D3 9 5 6 11 1.222
2019-20 Nazareth D3 26 13 16 29 1.115
2018-19 Nazareth D3 20 1 8 9 0.450
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2018-19 · Nazareth
+90.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2962
Forward overall
#144
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.32 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.342 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.