Michaela O'Connor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2015-16	Winsor	NE-Prep-Girls	11	20	3	23	2.090	1.2968	1.2968	—	—
2016-17	Winsor	NE-Prep-Girls	8	21	13	34	4.250	2.6371	2.6371	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2019-20	Williams	D3	NESCAC	—	22	2	7	9	0.409
2018-19	Williams	D3	NESCAC	—	27	4	4	8	0.296
2017-18	Williams	D3	NESCAC	FR	6	1	1	2	0.333

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

2.25

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.33

2017-18 · Williams

-85.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#83

Forward overall

in NE-Prep-Girls

D2/3 Comparables

Brooke Remington

Franklin Pierce · 2018-19

1.500 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Alex Hantge

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19

1.417 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Carly Moran

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2011-12

1.097 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.