← New Search ↗ Social Card

Megan Dulong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 5 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 25 5 9 14 0.560 0.0846 0.0846
2014-15 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 24 16 12 28 1.167 0.1762 0.1762
2015-16 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 25 9 12 21 0.840 0.1268 0.1268
2016-17 Grand Rapids-Greenway USHS-MN-W 25 15 18 33 1.320 0.1993 0.1993
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC 25 6 5 11 0.440
2020-21 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC 10 2 4 6 0.600
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 25 3 5 8 0.320
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 27 3 5 8 0.296
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 27 5 6 11 0.407
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Superior
+179.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4471
Forward overall
#792
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.32 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.548 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2014-15
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.