IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michaela McNamara Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Worcester Academy USHS-W 28 22 12 34 1.214 0.3651 0.3651 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Endicott D3 NEHC — 27 9 22 31 1.148
2018-19 Endicott D3 NEHC — 26 3 4 7 0.269
2017-18 Endicott D3 — SO 27 3 10 13 0.481
2016-17 Endicott D3 — FR 27 6 12 18 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2016-17 · Endicott
+113.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#972
Forward overall
#328
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Darby Dodds
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.37 No data
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Hespenheide
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Melissa Haganey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carly Radovich
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Corbin Boyd
Minnesota State ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Darby Dodds
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Hespenheide
St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.