IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kelsey Ryan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep-Girls 27 5 11 16 0.590 0.3661 0.3661 — —
2015-16 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep-Girls 28 15 12 27 0.960 0.5957 0.5957 — —
2016-17 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep-Girls 29 17 36 53 1.830 1.1355 1.1355 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 UMass Boston D3 — — 20 5 5 10 0.500
2019-20 UMass Boston D3 — — 26 10 7 17 0.654
2018-19 UMass Boston D3 — — 26 3 4 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.92
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2018-19 · UMass Boston
-70.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#425
Forward overall
#17
Forward born in 1998
#40
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
1.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Theresa Knutson
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 3.95 PPG
→ UConn (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
1.09 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooke Avery
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Theresa Knutson
UConn ·
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.