← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ellie Burris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 25 2 20 22 0.880 0.1329 0.1329
2013-14 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 25 12 19 31 1.240 0.1872 0.1872
2014-15 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 25 13 12 25 1.000 0.1510 0.1510
2015-16 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 23 14 23 37 1.609 0.2429 0.2429
2016-17 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 24 10 26 36 1.500 0.2265 0.2265
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC SO 27 3 4 7 0.259
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 12 1 1 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
-16.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3283
Forward overall
#431
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.52 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2012-13
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2015-16
0.633 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.