icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Anoka High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 17 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.059 | 0.0089 | 0.0089 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Anoka High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 0.375 | 0.0566 | 0.0566 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Anoka High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.120 | 0.0181 | 0.0181 | — | — |
| 2017-18 | Anoka High (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 0.240 | 0.0362 | 0.0362 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Concordia | D3 | — | — | 25 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0.440 |
| 2020-21 | Concordia | D3 | — | — | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.600 |
| 2019-20 | Concordia | D3 | — | — | 25 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0.520 |
| 2018-19 | Concordia | D3 | — | — | 24 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.208 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.