IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brie Larkowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Western Wisconsin Stars USHS-W 22 6 5 11 0.500 0.1504 0.1504 — —
2014-15 Western Wisconsin Stars USHS-W 17 8 10 18 1.059 0.3184 0.3184 — —
2015-16 Western Wisconsin Stars USHS-W 17 4 9 13 0.765 0.2299 0.2299 — —
2016-17 Western Wisconsin Stars USHS-W 24 22 20 42 1.750 0.5262 0.5262 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 27 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 11 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 18 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#1352
Forward overall
#458
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kaleigh Martinson
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Madi Nolan
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Katelyn Brightbill
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.844 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.