IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Delaney Calabrese Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Upper Fox Valley USHS-W 11 6 6 12 1.091 0.3280 0.3280 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SR 5 0 1 1 0.200
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 7 0 1 1 0.143
2020-21 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC JR 10 0 2 2 0.200
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 10 0 2 2 0.200
2019-20 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SO 20 2 0 2 0.100
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 20 2 0 2 0.100
2018-19 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC FR 21 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 21 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#1870
Forward overall
#643
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Megan Dulong
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Courtney Moser
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Hanson
Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.