IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sophie Rausch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Fergus Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 12 10 22 0.957 0.1444 0.1444 — —
2015-16 Fergus Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 22 10 32 1.333 0.2013 0.2013 — —
2016-17 Fergus Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 31 17 48 2.000 0.3020 0.3020 — —
2017-18 Fergus Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 25 19 44 1.760 0.2658 0.2658 — —
2018-19 Fergus Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 38 30 68 2.720 0.4107 0.4107 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 28 29 21 50 1.786
2022-23 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 28 32 16 48 1.714
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC — 25 21 13 34 1.360
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC — 2 3 1 4 2.000
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC — 26 15 20 35 1.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.35
2019-20 · Hamline
+345.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1442
Forward overall
#70
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Reagan Haley
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dana Rasmussen
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.