IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ivy Boric Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Anaheim Lady Ducks 16U AAA 16U-AAA-W 24 7 6 13 0.542 0.2429 0.2429 — —
2016-17 Anaheim Lady Ducks 16U AAA 16U-AAA-W 56 25 20 45 0.804 0.3603 0.3603 — —
2017-18 Anaheim Lady Ducks 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 38 15 11 26 0.684 0.2330 0.2330 — —
2018-19 Anaheim Lady Ducks 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 43 31 21 52 1.209 0.4118 0.4118 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 26 6 14 20 0.769
2023-24 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 28 6 14 20 0.714
2023-24 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 28 6 14 20 0.714
2022-23 Plattsburgh D3 — SR 29 15 11 26 0.897
2022-23 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 29 15 11 26 0.897
2022-23 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 29 15 11 26 0.897
2021-22 Plattsburgh D3 — JR 29 17 30 47 1.621
2021-22 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 29 17 30 47 1.621
2021-22 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 29 17 30 47 1.621
2020-21 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Plattsburgh D3 — FR 27 10 25 35 1.296
2019-20 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 27 10 25 35 1.296
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — — 27 10 25 35 1.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.30
2019-20 · Plattsburgh
+345.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1604
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Reagan Haley
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dana Rasmussen
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.